| Order Instituting Rulemaking | 12/20/2012 | Opens Rulemaking R12-12-011 |
| Decision 13-09-045 | 9/23/2013 | Establishes annual reporting requirements, including trip-level data. Footnote 42 is grants a presumption of confidentiality to Annual Reports. |
| Decision 16-04-041 | 4/25/2016 | Directs TNCs to submit plans for studying impacts to traffic-related injuries, impacts to the environment, traffic congestion, and VMT, and directs TNCs to demonstrate that fares are calculated by time and distance for fare-splitting rides in accordance with Pub. Util. Code § 5401. |
| Decision 20-03-014 | 3/16/2020 | Removes presumption of confidentiality, places burden on TNCs to show data should not be public, defines procedure for claiming confidentiality. Deletes Footnote 42. |
| 2020 Confidentiality Ruling | 12/21/2020 | Pursuant to the Uber 2020 Motion for Confidential Treatment and Lyft 2020 Motions for Confidential Treatment , grants the requests for confidential treatment for a limited number of data items, and denies the balance. |
| Decision 21-06-023 | 6/4/2021 | Modifies D. 20-03-014 to revise findings of fact and conclusions of law, but leaves the order in-tact. Denies the Uber and Lyft Requests for Rehearing of D. 20-03-014. |
| 2021 Confidentiality Ruling | 11/24/2021 | Pursuant to the Uber , Lyft , HopSkipDrive , and Nomad 2021 Motions for Confidential Treatment , grants the requests for confidential treatment for a limited number of data items, and denies the balance. |
| Decision 21-12-003 | 12/3/2021 | Adopts settlement agreement between the CPUC Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division (CPED), Uber, and The Rape, Abuse & Incest Nation Network, Inc. (RAINN) directing CPED and Uber to file a joint motion proposing to waive the presumption of confidentiality for reports filed prior to D. 20-03-014 (2014-2019). |
| Decision 22-05-033 | 5/6/2022 | Denies Lyft's appeal of the 2020 Confidentiality Ruling. |
| Decision 22-06-023 | 6/3/2022 | Grant's Lyft's Emergency Motion for Stay of D22-05-033 pending a ruling on Lyft’s Application for Rehearing of D. 22-05-033. |